Post Edit Home Help

Key Pages

Home |
Modern Ruins/ Industrial Archaeology |
Archaeological Formation |
-- |
Twentieth Century Science Fiction |
- |
Nineteenth Century Visions |
- |
Eighteenth Century Visions |
-- |
Romanticism |
-- |
Emotional Responses to Ruin |
- |
Ruins Ruminations |
-- |
Category Category |
Full List of Pages |
RSS |
Main Group

Changes [Dec 27, 2006]

The House I Once Ca...
Twentieth Century S...
Bibliography
Modern Ruins Pictur...
Acknowledgements
Full List of Pages
Modern Ruins/ Indus...
   More Changes...
Changes [Dec 27, 2006]: The House I Once Ca..., Twentieth Century S..., Bibliography, Modern Ruins Pictur..., ... MORE

Find Pages

Pages in this category:


Category Category

Archaeologists have for some time pondered the ways in which the archaeological record forms. How does the material that we dig up get to look the way it does?

Working as an Archaeologist, I have met several non-archaeologists who didn't understand the processes involved in the formation of the archaeological record, e.g. how a building or site that is not swamped by silt, landslides or volcanic flows can come to be buried so deeply. But this lack of understanding is not always confined to the non-professionals. Only relatively recently have archaeologists appreciated that a site's archaeology is not a direct record of what went on there, but instead may have been distorted by a whole series of processes.

C-Transforms and N-Transforms

Laura Spinney's "Return to Paradise"

Edit this Page - Attach File - Add Image - References - Print
Page last modified by David Platt Fri Sep 16/2005 15:42
You must signin to post comments.
Site Home > Sondage > Where London Stood > Archaeological Formation