Post Edit Home Help

Key Pages

Home |
Modern Ruins/ Industrial Archaeology |
Archaeological Formation |
-- |
By Century |
City By City |
-- |
Romanticism |
-- |
Emotional Responses to Ruin |
- |
Humour and the Elusiveness of the Past |
- |
Ruins Ruminations |
-- |
Category Category |
Bibliography |
Announcements |
Acknowledgements |
Contact |
RSS |
Main Group

Changes [Oct 04, 2009]

Bibliography
The Zealander
Brooklyn Bridge as ...
New York
Hanging Telephone
Post-Plague Glasgow...
By Century
   More Changes...
Changes [Oct 04, 2009]: Bibliography, The Zealander, Brooklyn Bridge as ..., New York, ... MORE

Find Pages

Archaeologists have for some time pondered the ways in which the archaeological record forms. How does the material that we dig up get to look the way it does?

Working as an Archaeologist, I have met several non-archaeologists who didn't understand the processes involved in the formation of the archaeological record, e.g. how a building or site that is not swamped by silt, landslides or volcanic flows can come to be buried so deeply. But this lack of understanding is not always confined to the non-professionals. Only relatively recently have archaeologists appreciated that a site's archaeology is not a direct record of what went on there, but instead may have been distorted by a whole series of processes.

Pages in this category:




Category Category
Edit this Page - Attach File - Add Image - References - Print
Page last modified by David Platt Sat Apr 25/2009 13:43
You must signin to post comments.
Site Home > Sondage > Where London Stood > Archaeological Formation