Key Pages
- |Changes [Feb 26, 2009]
The cameraWe will be focusing on intercollegiate polo (at Stanford) by looking at the "things" (tack, equipment, supplies, etc) that are a necessary part of the polo experience - and, of course, the ponies as well. By looking at the materiality, the little details, we hope to convey the enormous amounts of work and energy that go into the four periods of seven and a half minutes of play time in a game.
Intercollegiate Polo: Project Justifications
Intercollegiate Polo: Preliminary Constraints & Concerns
Intercollegiate Polo: Web Gallery
Intercollegiate Polo: Web Slideshow
The Material Culture of Professional Polo, as contrast.
Some Preliminary Shots of Stanford Polo Club.
Not a detail shot, but a very nice action shot, courtesy of Tara.
Possibly Relevant Critical Quotes:
Where photography takes itself out of context, severing the connections illustrated by Sander, Blossfeldt or Germaine Krull, where it frees itself from physiognomic, political and scientific interest, then it becomes creative. The lens now looks for interesting juxtapositions; photography turns into a sort of arty journalism. ... The creative in photography is its capitulation to fashion. The world is beautiful - that is its watchword. Therein is unmasked the posture of a photography that can endow any soup can with cosmic significance but cannot grasp a single one of the human connections in which exists, even where it most far-fetched subjects are more concerned with saleability than with insight. But because the true face of this kind of photographic creativity is the advertisement or association, it's logical counterpart is the act of unmasking or construction.
- ''A Small History of Photography," Walter Benjamin
We talked in class about the shots of professional polo looking like photos for brochures - advertisements. How much of what we are doing is the same thing? Is that bad? Is that "capitulating to fashion" as Benjamin says? What does this imply about the target audience and the message of our project?
Think about the fourth component of archaeological sensibility - Is this us?/Genealogy. How is intercollegiate polo different/similar to upper-class British polo, or polo in Argentina or in India? Are we polo players in that sense? If not, in what sense do we belong to the polo culture/community? In what sense are we polo players?